By Helen Caldicott
“Helen Caldicott has the infrequent skill to mix technology with ardour, common sense with love, and urgency with humor.” ―Naomi Klein
From the chief and spokeswoman of the antinuclear stream comes a revised and up to date version of this groundbreaking, broadly acclaimed vintage. Exploring risky worldwide tendencies akin to ozone depletion, worldwide warming, poisonous toxins, foodstuff infection, and deforestation, Helen Caldicott provides an image of our international and the forces that threaten its life. As constantly, she provides a prescription for a treatment and reason for wish, rallying readers to motion with the rivalry that our struggle for the planet will draw its power from love for the Earth itself.
Read Online or Download If You Love This Planet: A Plan to Save the Earth (Revised and updated) PDF
Best Environment books
“I learn this wide-ranging and considerate ebook whereas sitting at the banks of the Ganges close to Varanasi—it's a river already badly polluted, and now threatened by way of the melting of the lack of the glaciers at its resource to worldwide warming. 400 million humans rely on it, and there is no backup plan.
Ex-Green Beret George Hayduke has back from conflict to discover his liked southwestern wasteland threatened via commercial improvement. becoming a member of with Bronx exile and feminist saboteur Bonnie Abzug, desolate tract consultant and outcast Mormon Seldom obvious Smith, and libertarian billboard torcher document Sarvis, M. D. , Hayduke is able to struggle the facility taking up the strip miners, clear-cutters, and the road, dam, and bridge developers who're threatening the ordinary habitat.
The writer of final educate to Paradise tells the tale of the biggest public water undertaking ever created—William Mulholland’s la aqueduct—a tale of Gilded Age ambition, hubris, greed, and one made up our minds guy who is imaginative and prescient formed the longer term and maintains to affect us this day. In 1907, Irish immigrant William Mulholland conceived and outfitted one of many maximum civil engineering feats in historical past: the aqueduct that carried water 223 miles from the Sierra Nevada mountains to Los Angeles—allowing this small, resource-challenged wasteland urban to develop right into a sleek international city.
During the a long time guy has struggled along with his perceived position within the wildlife. the assumption of people cultivating the Earth to fit particular wishes is among the maximum issues of competition during this fight. for the way could have civilization stepped forward, if no longer via the clearance of the forests, the cultivation of the soil, and the conservation of untamed panorama into human payment?
Extra resources for If You Love This Planet: A Plan to Save the Earth (Revised and updated)
Approximately 60 percentage of the world’s most sensible agricultural land is positioned in just twenty-nine nations, and over forty percentage of the world’s agricultural land has been badly degraded. 21 an insignificant eleven percentage of the land quarter of the planet is acceptable for agriculture, but soil erosion linked to deforestation, dam development, and irrigation is depleting seventy five billion hundreds the world’s topsoil every year. 22 Our worldwide treasure is being misplaced within the sea and silting up rivers. additionally, approximately 2. five million acres (1 million hectares) of wealthy farmland within the United States—an zone greater than double the dimensions of Delaware—is destroyed via “development,” coated with asphalt, freeways, homes, and procuring facilities. In a global the place equitable redistribution of wealth is key, let’s now speak about the monetary aid that the rich 20 percentage at present supply to the negative eighty percentage. In 2007, the us spent over $625 billion on its army, whereas, by contrast, it contributed basically $22. 7 billion in overseas reduction in 2006. regrettably, merely $2 billion went for nutrients, $3. 2 billion for humanitarian reduction, and $5. 6 billion for sub-Saharan Africa. 23 Of the $22. 7 billion in US govt international relief in 2006, Israel acquired the most important amount—$2. five billion, so much of which it spent on its military—Egypt got the second-largest volume, by way of Iraq and Afghanistan; and in basic terms 4 of the world’s poorest nations—Ethiopia, Liberia, Uganda, and Tanzania—were one of the most sensible twenty indexed reduction recipients. 24 US voters, besides the fact that, are usually extra beneficiant than their govt, giving $34 billion in deepest in another country donations in 2006. 25 notice the novel distinction among spending cash on killing as opposed to spending cash to assist needy humans during the international. the main needy nations have been and are consistently shortchanged. 26 such a lot relief serves as an device of overseas coverage, not likely as a charitable reward. for instance, throughout the years 1991–2003, the us equipped during the UN to impose sanctions on Iraq, depriving it of worthwhile meals imports and scientific medicines, which helped to steer to the deaths of 5 thousand kids from malnutrition and waterborne illnesses every month. related sanctions concerning meals and scientific medicines were imposed on Cuba due to the fact that its revolution in 1953, and those sanctions proceed to use this present day. those are only circumstances within which the U.S. executive has withheld nutrients for political reasons. meals is used to gift and manage terrible international locations instead of to feed hungry humans. strangely, such a lot US reduction really lands up subsidizing American agencies. among the years 1995 and 1999, the USA gave among $6 billion and $15 billion in overseas relief, eighty percentage of which went to US businesses in overseas international locations. the most beneficiaries have been Israel, Egypt, Pakistan, India, and the Philippines. 27 So US overseas reduction serves not just as a coercive tool of overseas coverage, but in addition to help inner most US contractors, universities, banks, consulting enterprises, lobbyists, and so on.