By Stephen Jay Gould
"Gould himself is a unprecedented and lovely animal—a member of the endangered species referred to as the ruby-throated polymath. . . . [He] is a number one theorist on large-scale styles in evolution . . . [and] one of many sharpest and such a lot humane thinkers within the sciences." --David Quammen, New York occasions e-book Review
Read or Download The Flamingo's Smile: Reflections in Natural History PDF
Best Essays books
The 1st quantity of a sequence containing formerly unpublished Thurber fabric comprising drawings, cartoons, essays, autobiographical and biographical sketches. This publication is prepared essentially by way of topic, instead of by way of chronology or style. The editor has attempted to take advantage of Thurber's personal instincts for anthologising, blending different types of writing, article, essay, overview, caricature and parody.
An excellent and thought-provoking essay from one of many 20th century’s masters of fiction, Testaments Betrayed is written like a singular: a similar characters look and reappear in the course of the 9 components of the ebook, as do the important issues that preoccupy the writer. Kundera is a passionate defender of the ethical rights of the artist and the honour due a piece of paintings and its creator’s needs.
Half political disquisition, half trip magazine, half self-exploration, search is a set of essays and articles within which Denis Johnson primarily takes at the global. and never an obliging, easygoing global both; yet quite one within which horror and wonder exist in such proximity that they may good be interchangeable.
“A poignant, nostalgic selection of literary feedback via one in all America’s most well known authors. ”—Kirkus Reviews In tough nation is a sterling choice of essays, experiences, and feedback from Joyce Carol Oates that specializes in a wide range of books and writers—from Poe to Nabokov, from Flannery O’Connor to Phillip Roth.
Extra resources for The Flamingo's Smile: Reflections in Natural History
What else can one make of Oken舗s paean to 0: 舠The complete of arithmetic emerges out of 0, so needs to everything舰have emerged from the everlasting or not anything of nature舰. there is not any different technology than that which treats of not anything. 舡 Or his declare that every one 舠lower舡 animals are in basic terms incomplete people: 舠The animal country is just a dismemberment of the top animal, that's, of guy. 舡 while divorced from Oken舗s personal context, those statements lose all which means, and we will be able to purely chortle at their disembodied kind. whilst competently located, they no less than make experience (though we might pass judgement on them wrong today), and we may possibly characteristic Oken舗s extraordinary sort to changes in style and customized, to not stupidity or irrelevance. The context for many of his unusual pronouncements舒the primacy of 0, animals as aborted people, taxonomy by way of fives舒lies within the fundamental doctrine of Naturphilosophie: the belief of a unmarried, innovative developmental tendency in nature. All typical methods movement upward in a single course, ranging from primal nothingness (Oken舗s 0) and advancing towards human complexity and past. (Oken舗s view isn't evolutionary due to the fact each one new country starts back within the primal 0 and strikes one step past its predecessor. the next shape doesn't evolve by means of direct genealogical descent from a much less constructed ancestor, as an evolutionary conception will require. ) for the reason that all animals could be prepared in one sequence of ascending complexity, with people on most sensible, decrease creatures are incomplete people. (Oken outlined each one new step in complexity because the addition of an organ; hence, creatures lower than us at the ladder of growth comprise fewer organs and are incomplete. ) the buzz of recent theories lies of their energy to alter contexts, to render inappropriate what as soon as appeared good. If we snigger on the prior simply because we pass judgement on it anachronistically within the gentle of current theories, how do we comprehend those adjustments of context? and the way will we continue right humility towards our personal favorite theories and the chance in their personal destiny lapse into insignificance? sincere highbrow passions consistently advantage appreciate. Evolutionary thought used to be the best context changer within the background of biology. Theodosius Dobzhansky wrote in a well-known assertion that not anything in biology is smart other than within the mild of evolution. yet Oken舗s international made experience below a distinct set of ideals approximately how nature labored. Dobzhansky intended, in fact, that when we realize evolution because the foundation of natural background, all biology needs to be reformulated. but when we want to comprehend why evolution used to be this sort of watershed within the heritage of principles, we needs to understand the contexts that it changed, no longer view them as imperfect harbingers of evolution. They have been varied, refined, tremendous (and wrong), now not silly. We needs to learn such theories as Oken舗s category through fives, and we needs to research why evolution destroyed their motive if we want to clutch the sweep and gear of evolution itself. Oken舗s taxonomy through fives makes an attempt to reconcile rules, either pricey to Naturphilosophie, yet superficially in contradiction舒first, that animals symbolize a unmarried sequence of accelerating complexity outlined by means of the successive addition of organs; moment, that significant analogies permeate nature and that every phase of taxonomy mimics or mirrors all of the others (the order of mammals, for instance, needs to repeat in miniature a similar scheme that arranges all of nature).